Conjectures, refutations, and extrapolations.
نویسنده
چکیده
One reason why I have enjoyed reading earlier prefatory chapters is for the glimpses one gets of how the perception of problems, and insights into their nature, have grown from chance readings, comments by colleagues, or unexpected results. There is also the broader perspective on the evolution of our discipline and on the interactions among scientists. In short, they reveal the human face of science. But writing such a prefatory chapter is a different matter, as earlier authors have indicated. Scientists of my generation were trained to avoid the personal pronoun. “Art is I, Science is we,” as Claude Bernard stated.
منابع مشابه
An Application of Popper’s Method of Conjectures and Refutations to the Critique of Emerging Construction Theories
Karl Popper’s method of conjectures and refutationsis used as a framework to analyze and critique emerging construction theories. A perceived problem initiates the quest for tentative theories and error elimination as a solution. However, according to Popper, the result is a new version of the problem or an unintended consequence that creates anemergingproblem. The method of conjectures and ref...
متن کاملThe new NDT series Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR): elegance in nephrology research.
The new NDT series Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR): elegance in nephrology research In this issue of NDT, we inaugurate the new series of papers Ideas, Conjectures and Refutations (ICR). This new feature of our journal is sister to Polar Views in Nephrology and aims at creating a special space to host novel scientific ideas, amenable to empirical falsification and well-reasoned proposa...
متن کاملReflections on Soros: Mach, Quine, Arthur and Far-from-equilibrium Dynamics
We argue that the Soros account of reflexivity does not provide a clear-cut distinction between a social science such as economics and the physical sciences. It is pointed out that the participants who attempt to learn from refutations of conjectures in the Soros world are likely to be haunted by the Duhem-Quine problem of conjointness of hypotheses and unfocussed refutation. On a more construc...
متن کاملWhat kind of evidence could refute
A science is a series of ‘conjectures and refutations’. The most powerful conjectures are those that are formulated in such a way that they may be easily refuted by observation. On this account, Universal Grammar is an extremely weak hypothesis. This is because (i) there are very few precise formulations of exactly what is in UG (Wunderlich’s list on pp.620–623 being an admirable exception), an...
متن کاملA Justification For Popper’s Non-Justificationism
Based on a somewhat simple thesis that we can learn from our mistakes despite our fallibility, Karl Popper develops a non-justificationist theory of knowledge and of its growth. According to Popper (1989), knowledge, especially scientific knowledge, grows through unjustified conjectures (i.e. tentative solutions to our problems), which are controlled by criticism, or attempted refutations (incl...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Annual review of plant biology
دوره 54 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003